|
Author
|
Topic: The post to complain about stupid card prices, part 2
|
Tha Gunslinga Moderator
|
posted February 10, 2010 09:40 PM
  
So, we look at the last three Starcity Legacy Opens. ANT made 15th at one. It failed to make top 16 at the others. It did make 10th place at the Philadelphia Open in October. I see zero top 8s. I am not impressed. Winning a small tournament with a combo deck is easy. Winning a 128-person event is hard.__________________ Ebay problems? File a claim, leave a neg, buy on MOTL.Please DO NOT change your MOTL email. You will be locked out, and I can't help you.
|
thror Member
|
posted February 10, 2010 10:07 PM

AND it was a ONE-OF in that deck. Which is the norm for ANT. Because hitting a second off the first is terrible. This isnt like FoW, or fetches or duals, that are in every deck of thier color. Why are we confused about this being $1?__________________ "He fights you not because you have wronged him, but because you are there."
|
alphataru Member
|
posted February 10, 2010 10:33 PM

Seriously, Slinga, this is getting pointless. I'm talking about generally statistics, and you're talking about 3 specific tournies without looking at the field. If you look at last 3 SCG, Enchantress was in 1st place once, Belcher was in 3rd place once, B/W aggro (??) was in 2nd place once. Are you telling me that this is supposed to represent the top decks of Legacy? Again, I'm not arguing about the justification for the price of Ad nauseam, I'm just saying that you claiming ANT is a T2~3 deck is baseless, clueless, and ridiculous. There's really no arguing that.
|
-PoX- Member
|
posted February 10, 2010 10:58 PM

quote: Originally posted by thror: AND it was a ONE-OF in that deck. Which is the norm for ANT. Because hitting a second off the first is terrible. This isnt like FoW, or fetches or duals, that are in every deck of thier color. Why are we confused about this being $1?
I dunno, just seems funny than such an obviously broken engine card is basically worthless. But then again there's tons of other examples, like Necropotence, Yawgmoth's Bargain, Mind's Desire etc. Meh. Let's instead complain about Sea Drake being worth so much. DAMN YOU SEA DRAKE BLAR
|
Morbid- Member
|
posted February 10, 2010 11:23 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by -PoX-: I dunno, just seems funny than such an obviously broken engine card is basically worthless. But then again there's tons of other examples, like Necropotence, Yawgmoth's Bargain, Mind's Desire etc.Meh. Let's instead complain about Sea Drake being worth so much. DAMN YOU SEA DRAKE BLAR
Its applications are narrow, though. Whereas Necro/Bargain traded 1 life for 1 card, this is pretty much Dark Confidant on steroids. Not the best thing if you can't respond or take action between each card revealed. Plus, I've tried to break it in Standard, it's just not working. Everflowing Chalice was the closest thing to artifact mana in that deck, and it still wants 2 mana to cast it. What a pain. 
|
Tha Gunslinga Moderator
|
posted February 11, 2010 06:44 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by alphataru: Seriously, Slinga, this is getting pointless. I'm talking about generally statistics, and you're talking about 3 specific tournies without looking at the field. If you look at last 3 SCG, Enchantress was in 1st place once, Belcher was in 3rd place once, B/W aggro (??) was in 2nd place once. Are you telling me that this is supposed to represent the top decks of Legacy? Again, I'm not arguing about the justification for the price of Ad nauseam, I'm just saying that you claiming ANT is a T2~3 deck is baseless, clueless, and ridiculous. There's really no arguing that.
If you look at EVERY Legacy tournament SCG has in their books, which goes back to October 2008, Ad Nauseam made top 8 twice. Once was Tommy Kolowith before the mana floating rules changed, and one was 7th at an SCG Open. Meanwhile Life from the Loam made 10 top 8s, Counterbalance made over a dozen, Lord of Atlantis made 7, Chain Lightning made 8...
The deck is not tier 1, and cannot even make the SEMIFINALS in a decent-sized event. You have to look at events bigger than 5 rounds in order to actually determine how good a deck is. Anyway, what it boils down to is fairly simple anyway, so I don't know why I'm obsessing over the argument.
Ad Nauseam: Standard: no play (far as I know) Extended: no play (far as I know) Casual: no play (pretty much) EDH: no play Legacy: 1-4 of in one deck out of 50+, which makes up maybe 1-10% of any given metagame, occasionally more. Vintage: 1 deck, 4-of, makes up maybe 2-5% of the metagame, definitely not tier 1. So it's seeing marginal play in two tiny formats. It may or may not be good, but that's irrelevant; it's seeing almost no play, and will continue to be bulk until someone breaks it in a bigger format, or until it really takes off in Legacy. __________________ Ebay problems? File a claim, leave a neg, buy on MOTL.Please DO NOT change your MOTL email. You will be locked out, and I can't help you.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Tha Gunslinga on February 11, 2010]
 |
pugowar Member
|
posted February 11, 2010 07:33 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by Tha Gunslinga:
Ad Nauseam: Casual: no play (pretty much)
- I personally love it in my casual vampire deck. Nothing quite as cool as using it w/ the Vampire Nocturnus. But i guess that fits in the "(pretty much)" category. Tim
|
Michael French Member
|
posted February 11, 2010 07:51 AM
  
Saito Tomoharu won 180 person Legacy tournament in Osaka at the end of December with ANT. ANT is played a lot in Osaka. You see more Ant decks than Loam decks here. I think these are the top six played decks in Osaka.. in no order Zoo Dredge Counter top Goyf Merfolks ANT Goblins
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Michael French on February 11, 2010]
|
coasterdude84 Member
|
posted February 11, 2010 11:51 AM
  
It's a bad card that fits a niche in a so-so deck. It powers ANT, yes, but it's unusable anywhere else. I'm with Slinga on this one.
|
mm1983 Member
|
posted February 11, 2010 12:23 PM
  
Ad Nauseam or Mind's Desire aren't worth much but sometimes it's the other cards that work with those cards that have value.
|
stu55 Member
|
posted February 11, 2010 01:03 PM

quote: Originally posted by alphataru: Stuff no one wants to hear....
Tell me this is you: http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=220495 If this is you, and you are trying to tell us how a card should be priced well....heh
|
Vinceisg0d Member
|
posted February 11, 2010 03:45 PM
  
That's actually not too, too bad. You realize those are all foils, right?quote: Originally posted by stu55: Tell me this is you: http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=220495 If this is you, and you are trying to tell us how a card should be priced well....heh
|
stu55 Member
|
posted February 11, 2010 04:05 PM

quote: Originally posted by Vinceisg0d: That's actually not too, too bad. You realize those are all foils, right?
still at foils, those things are going to drop fast like other stuff has in the past...especially those rares
|
alphataru Member
|
posted February 11, 2010 07:49 PM

quote: Originally posted by stu55: Tell me this is you: http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=220495 If this is you, and you are trying to tell us how a card should be priced well....heh
Wow, stalking me from another site? I guess "get a life" is no longer an option for you.
|
MagixDK Member
|
posted February 12, 2010 01:40 AM

Ohh I feel the retort of "Nerd!" comming soon.Internets arguments are fail.
|
pugowar Member
|
posted February 12, 2010 04:04 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by MagixDK: Ohh I feel the retort of "Nerd!" comming soon.Internets arguments are fail.
People who say "fail" are nerds..
|
alphataru Member
|
posted February 12, 2010 01:21 PM

quote: Originally posted by stu55: still at foils, those things are going to drop fast like other stuff has in the past...especially those rares
Please try harder to compensate for your inability to topic titles.
|
nderdog Moderator
|
posted February 12, 2010 01:33 PM
  
That's enough thread derailment, folks.__________________ There's no need to fear, UNDERDOG is here!All your Gruul Nodorogs are belong to me. Trade them to me, please! Report rules violations. Remember the Auctions Board!
|
-PoX- Member
|
posted February 13, 2010 04:51 AM

Holy crap, is Force of will really getting to be worth 45+$ ?? This is the price online stores have them at now. WhaaaNow THAT is ridiculous. Also, lol, sinkhole at 40$ in stores. It's used in what? One bad legacy deck?
|
CoupDeGrace Member
|
posted February 13, 2010 06:42 AM

sinkhole is just a casual cards yet so expensive. It applies to doubling season, sliver queen and so on.
|
-PoX- Member
|
posted February 13, 2010 07:24 AM

quote: Originally posted by CoupDeGrace: sinkhole is just a casual cards yet so expensive. It applies to doubling season, sliver queen and so on.
What's casual about sinkhole? They sell it for 10 bucks less than dual lands from the same collection. Dual lands for crying out loud. What's even fun about sinkhole for casual? I know it was pretty big in Sui Black decks. 10 years ago...
|
thror Member
|
posted February 13, 2010 10:52 AM

mono black and Eva green in legacy both rely pretty heavily on sinkhole. coupled with wasteland, it can be a devastating piece of disruption. And it was only in ABU, so there aren't tons of RV alternatives floating around. $40 is high, but that's because you're checking online stores...__________________ "He fights you not because you have wronged him, but because you are there."
[Edited 1 times, lastly by thror on February 13, 2010]
|
Filip Cec Member
|
posted February 13, 2010 01:01 PM
  
metalworker at 14$????? why???
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Filip Cec on February 13, 2010]
|
yukizora Member
|
posted February 13, 2010 01:15 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by thror: mono black and Eva green in legacy both rely pretty heavily on sinkhole. coupled with wasteland, it can be a devastating piece of disruption. And it was only in ABU, so there aren't tons of RV alternatives floating around. $40 is high, but that's because you're checking online stores...
Don't forget about the local market. Actually I think I can sell them for like 30 bucks.__________________ The Swiss Guy is there! Playing: T1.X Dark Zoo, T1 & T1.5 Bant
|
Mr.C Member
|
posted February 13, 2010 01:54 PM

It seems almost there are speculators at work in MtG, and soon we will see a massive crash.
| |