|
Author
|
Topic: MOTL Fantasy Baseball 2010 signups!!!
|
hilikuS Member
|
posted December 03, 2009 09:05 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by super324: L's and W's give pitchers less over their fate control than k/9. Like Tiny Tim should have had a 20+ win season almost every year, but he plays in San Fransisco. K/9 is one of the only things pitchers have DIRECT control over...save if he has a horrible ump.
The pitcher's control over the outcome of games isn't really a concern though. If you want to get wins, you draft the guys on better teams. When you draft Lincy, you go in knowing you're probably gettin 16 wins, and that he's gonna pitch better than 16 wins. That said, I do like K/9 if not Holds (since holds seems to be unfavorable as hell). Should we put it to a vote? 1. Add OPS and K/9 2. Add OPS and Losses 3. Don't add anything Assuming that we're all agreeing on OPS that is. __________________ MMObaseball CentSportsPlay em, they're fun and free!
[Edited 1 times, lastly by hilikuS on December 03, 2009]
|
puregoblinboy47 Member
|
posted December 03, 2009 10:54 PM
  
What about OBA as a pitcher stat? That one seems very draftable without throwing the curve off too far.
|
OGB Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 05:26 AM

I think OPS is fine, and I've never played in a league where holds was a stat.I'm fine with anything though.
|
Thanos Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 06:13 AM
  
No changes, default yahoo stats.
|
puregoblinboy47 Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 10:53 AM
  
Well, holds is interesting because it gives good middle relief pitchers some actual value beyond there was nobody else decent on the WW. You can't just have starters and closers on your team.I do however think while it's a cool stat, it's best used in deep leagues where there isn't even enough legitamate closers to give every one one.
|
TerryJ15 Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 02:11 PM
  
Thanks for the add! 12th pick !!I'll name my team...Terry's Princess Pumpkins
|
Thanos Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 02:21 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by TerryJ15: Thanks for the add! 12th pick !!I'll name my team...Terry's Princess Pumpkins
12th pick is awesome, don't fret.
|
TerryJ15 Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 02:22 PM
  
It's not bad in baseball, no. And I like back to back picks.
|
Montague Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 02:41 PM
  
So, anybody want to point out a good place to read about some basic fantasy baseball strategy?
|
TerryJ15 Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 02:56 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by Montague: So, anybody want to point out a good place to read about some basic fantasy baseball strategy?
Sounds silly, but pick up one of those fantasy magazines. It'll be good to keep track of whos been drafted and who hasn't as you can mark out whos been picked.
|
super324 Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 03:37 PM

Add OPS and K/9__________________ Born in America land of the free, for the right price that's how it will be. -MF Grimm
|
daner Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 03:43 PM
  
So far the majority is OPS and K/9....anyone else want to weigh in on the subject other wise I'll change the settings to add those stats. Does anyone want to just add OPS? And not add anything to pitching?
|
Thanos Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 03:47 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by daner: So far the majority is OPS and K/9....anyone else want to weigh in on the subject other wise I'll change the settings to add those stats. Does anyone want to just add OPS? And not add anything to pitching?
Please keep it even if you're going to add stats.
|
hammr7 Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 04:38 PM

I've never played a league with holds, but I think it would make middle relievers more valuable, and force us all to do some homework. I certainly don't have a clue who the hold leaders were for either league.I think K/inning and total K's tend to be redundant, since the best strikeout pitchers are already drafted as some of the best starters and closers. It will further diminish the value of non-strikeout pitchers, even if they rack up some wins and decent ratios.
|
daner Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 05:33 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by hammr7: I've never played a league with holds, but I think it would make middle relievers more valuable, and force us all to do some homework. I certainly don't have a clue who the hold leaders were for either league.I think K/inning and total K's tend to be redundant, since the best strikeout pitchers are already drafted as some of the best starters and closers. It will further diminish the value of non-strikeout pitchers, even if they rack up some wins and decent ratios.
I agree with you on both accounts...and furthermore think OPS is also redundant. It's a stat based upon other stats we already get credit for. Obviously there isn't going to be a guy with a high OPS that isn't going to give you good HR/RBI #'s since the majority of OPS realy is the Slugging %. Guys who hit more hr's have better OPS's...and in turn generally have more RBI's. So why even add any stat, bc like you said you're just adding redundancy.
|
super324 Member
|
posted December 04, 2009 06:49 PM

quote: Originally posted by daner: I agree with you on both accounts...and furthermore think OPS is also redundant. It's a stat based upon other stats we already get credit for. Obviously there isn't going to be a guy with a high OPS that isn't going to give you good HR/RBI #'s since the majority of OPS realy is the Slugging %. Guys who hit more hr's have better OPS's...and in turn generally have more RBI's. So why even add any stat, bc like you said you're just adding redundancy.
By that logic HRs are redundant since the majority of high HR guys have high RBIs and Runs. What OPS adds is a true value of a hitter to a team and walks. Same with K/9, since Ks are much better than a hit fields, theres a really long explanation for this that I can C/p if you want me to. K/9 can also add more dept if you want to draft middle relievers. __________________ Born in America land of the free, for the right price that's how it will be. -MF Grimm
|
puregoblinboy47 Member
|
posted December 05, 2009 08:15 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by hammr7:
I think K/inning and total K's tend to be redundant, since the best strikeout pitchers are already drafted as some of the best starters and closers. It will further diminish the value of non-strikeout pitchers, even if they rack up some wins and decent ratios.
How do you feel about Opposing Batting Average as a stat? I feel like this stat is pretty non-redundant.
|
hammr7 Member
|
posted December 05, 2009 12:39 PM

To me, whip is pretty close to opposing batting average, or is at least a strong alternative. One ignores BBs, while the other includes it. And opposing OPS or slugging percentage is probably correlated with ERA. There could be some weird pitching stats to play with, if Yahoo has them. For starters, number of pitches per start (always more bizarre than number of innings) would be pretty weird. This might actually make pitchers in hitter-friendly parks more popular. For relievers, % or number of inherited runners who score would be different. The latter may or may not tie in to holds.
|
speechjew Member
|
posted December 05, 2009 01:37 PM

could always replace batting average with OBP
|
daner Member
|
posted December 06, 2009 09:30 AM
  
quote: Originally posted by super324: By that logic HRs are redundant since the majority of high HR guys have high RBIs and Runs. What OPS adds is a true value of a hitter to a team and walks.
I agree, it is redundant. I wasn't arguing I was just stating why the hell do you want to add more redundancy? If you want to add something that isn't alread accounted for add Walks to the hitters stats, but the masses love OPS.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by daner on December 06, 2009]
|
hilikuS Member
|
posted December 06, 2009 09:33 AM
  
Fielding Percentage. Totally unrelated to anything fantasy baseball .__________________ MMObaseball CentSportsPlay em, they're fun and free!
|
super324 Member
|
posted December 06, 2009 10:31 AM

quote: Originally posted by daner: I agree, it is redundant. I wasn't arguing I was just stating why the hell do you want to add more redundancy? If you want to add something that isn't alread accounted for add Walks to the hitters stats, but the masses love OPS.
Because I am a follower of moneyball. thats why. __________________ Born in America land of the free, for the right price that's how it will be. -MF Grimm
|
daner Member
|
posted December 08, 2009 11:19 AM
  
Ok, we are going to try it out this year. We will add both OPS for hitters, and K/9 for pitching.Please make adjustments to your lists if you have one.
|
speechjew Member
|
posted December 09, 2009 03:53 PM

OPS or OBP?and also, I'll take offers for the 1st pick.
|
daner Member
|
posted December 09, 2009 11:59 PM
  
quote: Originally posted by speechjew: OPS
|